Browser recommendation

Talk about anything and everything not related to this site or the Dreamcast, such as news stories, political discussion, or anything else. If there's not a forum for it, it belongs in here. Also, be warned that personal insults, threats, and spamming will not be tolerated.
User avatar
DaMadFiddler
Team Screamcast
Team Screamcast
Posts: 7953
https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
Joined: Fri Feb 06, 2004 7:17 am
Location: San Francisco, CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Browser recommendation

Post by DaMadFiddler »

I've spent the last month or so evaluating different web browsers, trying to determine which one loads the fastest, seems the most stable, and operates best with different websites and such.

A lot of people have very specific favorites around here...most commonly, Firefox, Opera, and Camino. I've been a longtime Mozilla/Firefox user, but it has gotten somewhat bloated over the years, and I wanted to see if there was anything faster or with more to offer. Camino (for OSX only) seemed a likely choice at first, but it is very buggy in how it handles some websites. I just didn't like the feel of Opera. IE is a mess, and Safari is out of date in terms of features.

Well, after using it exclusively for about a week and a half, I think I have a winner: Flock.

http://www.flock.com

It's Firefox-derived, so you can still use plugins (such as the ever-vital Adblock). It's also cross-platform. It handles tabs better than Firefox, it has a deeper bookmarking system, and it does some incredibly useful and extensive things with the search bar. It's got a bunch of little time-saving caveats, like batch integration with various social networking sites, a built-in RSS manager, and little integration things like shortcuts. For example, if I'm in a text edit field on a website, and I drag a picture and drop it into the text box, it'll automatically insert the appropriate HTML tag.

Plus, my preliminary tests seem to show it loading faster and using slightly less resources than vanilla Firefox...and the interface is a lot sleeker.

The way it's promoted is kind of annoying, with this sort of me-too chic (even the name reflects this), but the browser itself is a really solid piece of software.

I'd never seen it mentioned here before, so I thought I might suggest it and see what other people thought.
Sir Savant
Somewhat Dumb Knight
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Sir Savant »

I will try it with the extensions I have installed in Firefox. I wonder if the profiles are backwards compatible...
User avatar
JellyWarrior
General Jelly
General Jelly
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 1:17 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by JellyWarrior »

Yea Flock is a great version of Firefox, but I switched back to regular Firefox just for personal reasons till Flock progresses a little more.

For the adventurous of you out there, perhaps you could consider trying "Swift". It's a Windows browser that uses Apple's WebKit rendering engine, the same engine that runs Apple's internet stuff like Safari.

Get it from this link - http://www.getswift.org/

Currently it is at version 0.1, it is very very alpha, in fact it is so alpha that you can't even click drop down boxes yet.

It's well worth checking out if you just want to see how Apple's WebKit engine runs on a PC, I've suffered no bad effects from installing it and trying it. Just don't expect to make it your primary browser for a little while.
Skype: distinctive
I am involved in : Mytalk | Comet TV | Distinctive Web Services
User avatar
JellyWarrior
General Jelly
General Jelly
Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Mar 11, 2002 1:17 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by JellyWarrior »

Sir Savant wrote:I will try it with the extensions I have installed in Firefox. I wonder if the profiles are backwards compatible...
Extensions need to have their install files altered, so there are Flock versions of most extensions.

Profiles are not backwards compatable but you can import profiles from Firefox, so it's a non issue really.
Skype: distinctive
I am involved in : Mytalk | Comet TV | Distinctive Web Services
Sir Savant
Somewhat Dumb Knight
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Sir Savant »

They killed bookmark support. Sorry. And it loads slow, I think because of the way it imported the Firefox Bookmarks.
User avatar
Specially Cork
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 11632
Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 10:01 am
Has thanked: 1 time
Been thanked: 8 times

Post by Specially Cork »

Im not sure, it seems far slower than firefox to me, and uses slightly more resources. Also I dont like any of its extra features, and Im having trouble with extensions. Ill pass for now.
Image
User avatar
Covar
DCEmu Mega Fan
DCEmu Mega Fan
Posts: 2990
Joined: Sat Nov 30, 2002 8:06 am
Location: Cary, NC
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by Covar »

on the mac version it was barely better on resources than firefox with all my extensions, flock had none. and since filterset.g is not available i decided to just stick with firefox.
Nick
DCEmu Super Fan
DCEmu Super Fan
Posts: 2498
Joined: Mon Nov 29, 2004 12:11 am
Location: United States
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Nick »

How is Firefox "bloated"? That's ridiculous to call Firefox bloated. The only problem I have with it is that sometimes it doesn't work correctly with websites. Otherwise, it does everything I need. And it only takes up like 70 MB RAM or something like that, which isn't that much when you should probably be rocking at least 1 GB or more.
Very sexy hero, omg
User avatar
Wagh
Wagh
Posts: 5746
Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 7:59 pm
Location: YSOH
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by Wagh »

<3 for Opera. I tried flock once. Didn't like it. Went back to trusty old Opera.
Bush and Hussein together in bed
Giving H-E-A-D head
Y'all motherfuckers heard what we said
Billions made and millions dead
Sir Savant
Somewhat Dumb Knight
Posts: 3653
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 2:26 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Sir Savant »

Flock does not like bookmarks, which are the foundation of my existance. Although it did get me to sign up for del.icio.us, photobucket and flickr, the integration is not enough to overcome the buggy performance.
bizzle
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by bizzle »

Nick wrote:How is Firefox "bloated"? That's ridiculous to call Firefox bloated. The only problem I have with it is that sometimes it doesn't work correctly with websites. Otherwise, it does everything I need. And it only takes up like 70 MB RAM or something like that, which isn't that much when you should probably be rocking at least 1 GB or more.
Fiddler just likes to complain.
Ex-Cyber
DCEmu User with No Life
DCEmu User with No Life
Posts: 3641
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Ex-Cyber »

Nick wrote:How is Firefox "bloated"? That's ridiculous to call Firefox bloated.
It's definitely bloated compared to browsers that avoid bloat as a major project goal, such as Dillo.
Nick wrote:And it only takes up like 70 MB RAM or something like that, which isn't that much when you should probably be rocking at least 1 GB or more.
Not everybody replaces their computer every year, and even low-end systems sold today still have 256MB or 512MB. Web browsing is not Doom 3 or Oblivion, FFS. Outside of things like Flash and Java it's not really justifiable for the requirements to keep going up, and even with those it's questionable.
Last edited by Ex-Cyber on Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:01 pm, edited 3 times in total.
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
User avatar
MulletMan13
DCEmu Ex-Mod
DCEmu Ex-Mod
Posts: 2830
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 7:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by MulletMan13 »

I don't get why people are so crazy about extensions.

Give me a small, quick, light browser that lets me view webpages and I'm set.
Image
penor: hay gusy how do i make ubuntu look cool like vista
User avatar
GratefulDead
Insane DCEmu
Insane DCEmu
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Canada
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by GratefulDead »

Looks like it has potential, but still... Firefox > Teh Wordl.

|/|
djray
Psychotic DCEmu
Psychotic DCEmu
Posts: 608
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 6:01 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by djray »

Nick wrote:How is Firefox "bloated"?
Nick wrote:And it only takes up like 70 MB RAM or something like that...
i rest my case! lol
you should never have to spend that much RAM using a web browser!
Image
BlackAura
DC Developer
DC Developer
Posts: 9951
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 9:02 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by BlackAura »

You do realise that all web browsers use lots of RAM, right? It's more a matter of changing content on web pages driving up memory usage than "bloated" web browsers.
|darc|
DCEmu Webmaster
DCEmu Webmaster
Posts: 16378
Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 6:00 pm
Location: New Orleans, LA
Has thanked: 111 times
Been thanked: 91 times
Contact:

Post by |darc| »

MulletMan13 wrote:I don't get why people are so crazy about extensions.

Give me a small, quick, light browser that lets me view webpages and I'm set.
Agreed. I use Safari on Mac and Firefox on Windows.
It's thinking...
User avatar
MulletMan13
DCEmu Ex-Mod
DCEmu Ex-Mod
Posts: 2830
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 7:44 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by MulletMan13 »

To be fair to the OP, FireFox on OSX isn't as great as it is on Windows... comparatively its one of the slower browsers. Modified versions of it running the Gekko engine are quicker, whereas Webkit based browsers are the quickest... its like a whole different world.

I use FF on Windows and Camino on OSX.
Image
penor: hay gusy how do i make ubuntu look cool like vista
User avatar
AuroEdge
DCEmu Mega Poster
DCEmu Mega Poster
Posts: 1667
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2004 8:00 pm
Location: Anywhere
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by AuroEdge »

70MB for a browser is ridiculous. If I go to a flash intensive site such as Newgrounds, the RAM usage skyrockets. Not to mention the flash plugin for Firefox runs flash much slower than on IE. This is very noticeable on slower machines. I don't know if this can be avoided, but once you leave newgrounds no matter what sort of site you go to the RAM usage still stays high. On older machines you may as well just disable flash unless you absolutely need it for a specific site.
Image
"The only difference between the Democrats and the Republicans is
that the Democrats allow the poor to be corrupt, too." -Oscar Levant
BlackAura
DC Developer
DC Developer
Posts: 9951
Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 9:02 am
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 1 time

Post by BlackAura »

So the Flash plugin being a slow, resource guzzling pile of crap is somehow Firefox's fault?
Post Reply