I am a plantation owner who wants to kill all black people

Post by **Roofus** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:35 pm

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y10RYQyAQh8

hearld500 · Post by **hearld500** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 5:51 pm

He kinda looks like the Predator.

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:11 pm

Youtube qualifies as news?

Post by **Roofus** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:15 pm

It was on CSPAN and it's kind of political.

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Mon Nov 20, 2006 8:28 pm

Ah, I didn't click it. I just don't click Youtube links anymore.

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:41 am

the sad thing is how this was aired with no controversy because he is a "racial minority", yet there is no fucking way c-span would allow some alabama clansmen to preach such hatred for africans. it's hypocrisy, and whoever reads this knows it is.

Post by **Roofus** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 12:58 am

Jeeba Jabba wrote:the sad thing is how this was aired with no controversy because he is a "racial minority", yet there is no fucking way c-span would allow some alabama clansmen to preach such hatred for africans. it's hypocrisy, and whoever reads this knows it is.

I was saying the exact same thing to my dad tonight.

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:02 am

i would never agree with either side, because i dont believe in extremism and i dont believe in racism, but, in practical terms, for the mindset of a civilization, it's a much bigger loss for society that one side of an argument is allowed, while the other is not, than it is that both of those sides even exist. which for me is pretty hard to say. but it's true.

APE · Post by **APE** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 1:06 am

I want to kill dumb people, or just use superior intellect to prevent them from breeding. We can start with Stagg and work our way up.

If I heard him right we are trying to kill them through electromagnetism, and through cigarettes that anyone can smoke willingly. Perhaps they shouldn't smoke?

toastman · Post by **toastman** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 11:41 am

APE wrote:I want to kill dumb people, or just use superior intellect to prevent them from breeding. We can start with Stagg and work our way up.

We'll be sad to see you go.

Well, not really, but whatever.

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 3:18 pm

Jeeba Jabba wrote:i would never agree with either side, because i dont believe in extremism and i dont believe in racism, but, in practical terms, for the mindset of a civilization, it's a much bigger loss for society that one side of an argument is allowed, while the other is not, than it is that both of those sides even exist. which for me is pretty hard to say. but it's true.

Extremism is not a belief, its a measurement of the intensity of a belief.

greay · Post by **greay** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:26 pm

jaredfogle wrote:
Jeeba Jabba wrote:i would never agree with either side, because i dont believe in extremism and i dont believe in racism, but, in practical terms, for the mindset of a civilization, it's a much bigger loss for society that one side of an argument is allowed, while the other is not, than it is that both of those sides even exist. which for me is pretty hard to say. but it's true.
Extremism is not a belief, its a measurement of the intensity of a belief.

He didn't say it was.

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:39 pm

greay wrote:
jaredfogle wrote:
Jeeba Jabba wrote:i would never agree with either side, because i dont believe in extremism and i dont believe in racism, but, in practical terms, for the mindset of a civilization, it's a much bigger loss for society that one side of an argument is allowed, while the other is not, than it is that both of those sides even exist. which for me is pretty hard to say. but it's true.
Extremism is not a belief, its a measurement of the intensity of a belief.
He didn't say it was.

I think by saying that he doesn't believe in extremism (obviously he is not denying the existence of extreme perspectives) he implies that it is a belief to be held by those willing.

But let's not trod off into semantics.

The root of my correction was in my distaste for the Bush Administration's usage of the term.

SuperMegatron · Post by **SuperMegatron** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 4:52 pm

What is really funny is that only 5 people showed up to hear this guy talk and c-span still aired it.

APE · Post by **APE** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:15 pm

toastman wrote:
APE wrote:I want to kill dumb people, or just use superior intellect to prevent them from breeding. We can start with Stagg and work our way up.
You'll be sad to see myself go.

Well, not really, but whatever.

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Tue Nov 21, 2006 5:29 pm

jaredfogle wrote:
greay wrote:
jaredfogle wrote:
Jeeba Jabba wrote:i would never agree with either side, because i dont believe in extremism and i dont believe in racism, but, in practical terms, for the mindset of a civilization, it's a much bigger loss for society that one side of an argument is allowed, while the other is not, than it is that both of those sides even exist. which for me is pretty hard to say. but it's true.
Extremism is not a belief, its a measurement of the intensity of a belief.
He didn't say it was.
I think by saying that he doesn't believe in extremism (obviously he is not denying the existence of extreme perspectives) he implies that it is a belief to be held by those willing.

But let's not trod off into semantics.

The root of my correction was in my distaste for the Bush Administration's usage of the term.

what i meant to say is that i don't believe in judging and acting in absolutes, nor am i comfortable with it. life is too vague to scope most movements, especially hate.

'kill all of the blacks and end innercity gang violence' wow. that would most definitely work. but you'd also be killing 95% of a race.

and while we're on this topic, thanks to the esteemed gentleman on c-span, wealth and power can lead to abuse just as much as poverty causes crime. it's human instinct. and until we learn to reconcile with that, there will be confusion and misunderstanding on both ends of the spectrum.

toastman · Post by **toastman** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 12:20 pm

APE wrote:
toastman wrote:
APE wrote:I want to kill dumb people, or just use superior intellect to prevent them from breeding. We can start with Stagg and work our way up.
You'll be sad to see myself go.

Well, not really, but whatever.

See what I mean. First of all, not really funny or witty. Second of all, grammatically wrong. It should be: "You'll be sad to see me go."

Post by **|darc|** » Wed Nov 22, 2006 4:55 pm

toastman wrote:Second of all, grammatically wrong.

toastman · Post by **toastman** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 10:12 am

Darcus Magnus wrote:
toastman wrote:Second of all, grammatically wrong.

Do you still need it fully spelled out? "Second of all, [it is] grammatically wrong." At least it is acceptable, whereas using the possessive for the third person is just trying to sound pompous.

Post by **|darc|** » Sat Nov 25, 2006 11:05 am

toastman wrote:
Darcus Magnus wrote:
toastman wrote:Second of all, grammatically wrong.

Do you still need it fully spelled out? "Second of all, [it is] grammatically wrong." At least it is acceptable, whereas using the possessive for the third person is just trying to sound pompous.

When does the excited face mean "Hey, your grammar is wrong!"? I was simply being happy that you were correcting grammar. Y'know, seeing that I"m the resident grammar nazi and all.