Sampling legality?
-
- DCEmu User with No Life
- Posts: 3641
- https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Sampling legality?
Does anyone know of a good primer on the legal issues surrounding sampling in music? I'm particularly interested in the legality of sampling individual notes or chords for use in an unrelated composition, as opposed to wholesale lifting of sequences a la M.C. Hammer or Vanilla Ice. Unfortunately the texts I've found so far seem to make little if any distinction between the two, but I suspect that there is a basis for a legal difference.
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
-
- Insane DCEmu
- Posts: 211
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2002 10:11 am
- Location: Canada
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
I make hiphop music using an MPC2000XL. I dont know if your familiar with that but basically i use records and sample parts of them then arrange them and basically make a beat from it. Ive read many topics on the mpc forums about these issues and there are mixed opinions. a lot of times it depends exactly what your sampling, who your sampling from, is it a recognizable sample. Theres many factors. If your using it for commericial use and you want to be safe youd probably want to have the sample cleared.
After reading what i just put in this post and what you said i dont know if it really helps at all but basically what im saying is that sometimes things can be sampled and youll be fine and sometimes you won't, it depends on several variables. If you are going to sample and are worried about it you can try to get the sample cleared or if your selling the composition that uses the sample the persons buying it can have it cleared.
Thats my 2 cents
After reading what i just put in this post and what you said i dont know if it really helps at all but basically what im saying is that sometimes things can be sampled and youll be fine and sometimes you won't, it depends on several variables. If you are going to sample and are worried about it you can try to get the sample cleared or if your selling the composition that uses the sample the persons buying it can have it cleared.
Thats my 2 cents
-
- DCEmu Turkey Baster
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Tue Feb 26, 2002 8:34 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
-
- DCEmu User with No Life
- Posts: 3641
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
1) That's a disambiguation page.darc wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling
2) The Wikipedia article on music sampling is one of the texts that doesn't really make a distinction; it appears to refer to instances of both individual instrument sounds and musical sequences as "a sample", which makes the various legal bits nearly useless for what I want to figure out.
I don't see how that clears up the issue. Non-commercial copying is not automatically non-infringing, and grabbing the "wrong" samples could still result in a pile of lawsuit threats and/or injunctions being shoved down your throat.jaredfogle wrote:The best thing to do is ignore all copyright law and distribute your music non-commercially.
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
-
- DCEmu Webmaster
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 6:00 pm
- Location: New Orleans, LA
- Has thanked: 111 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
- Contact:
Oops, I read the sampling page and closed it without copying the link, and just rewrote it out instead of going to it again.Ex-Cyber wrote:1) That's a disambiguation page.darc wrote:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sampling
But really, I think that's the best you're going to do. If you're interested in any musical endeavors that involve sampling, it's time to get a lawyer, imo.
It's thinking...
booyakasha!jaredfogle wrote:The best thing to do is ignore all copyright law and distribute your music non-commercially.
It sure launched Danger Mouse into a great career.
man that guy loves to sample library music! he's just a guy that loves music and suddenly he's well sought-after! wish that could happen to me!
- Specially Cork
- Moderator
- Posts: 11632
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 10:01 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
It doesnt clear up the issue, but record companies are far more leniant with copyright infringement when they see that you aren't profiting from what you are doing.Ex-Cyber wrote:I don't see how that clears up the issue. Non-commercial copying is not automatically non-infringing, and grabbing the "wrong" samples could still result in a pile of lawsuit threats and/or injunctions being shoved down your throat.
Take a look at http://www.oceremix.org Every single song on that site is a potential copyright lawsuit, yet the site has been up and running for 7 years without a single complaint.
If you want this legal issue fully resolved you're going to need to pay for legal advice, and even they will almost certainly turn round and say it is illegal. So why not just do it anyway? You won't get sued out of the blue. The worst that will happen is you are asked to stop distributing something. Hardly a big deal is it?
-
- DCEmu User with No Life
- Posts: 3641
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
I'm interested primarily in the opinions of judges, not lawyers. Lawyers' opinions are just advice; judges' opinions are binding interpretations of the law.BoneyCork wrote:If you want this legal issue fully resolved you're going to need to pay for legal advice, and even they will almost certainly turn round and say it is illegal.
It's not about me getting sued. Without getting into a big rant about alternative licensing models and such, I'll just say that the issue is bigger than that.BoneyCork wrote:So why not just do it anyway? You won't get sued out of the blue. The worst that will happen is you are asked to stop distributing something. Hardly a big deal is it?
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
- Specially Cork
- Moderator
- Posts: 11632
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 10:01 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
It is quite clear that what you are asking for is beyond the reach of a Dreamcast Emulation message board. You're breaching copyright by sampling things without permission. Thats the meat of it. If you want Judge's opnions and decisions on specific interpretations of copyright law, you're still better off going to a lawyer as they are the people who would keep track of, and be able to provide such information.
- az_bont
- Administrator
- Posts: 13567
- Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2002 8:35 am
- Location: Swansea, Wales
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
I'm sure any reasonably competant lawyer will give you an opinion based on the current state of the law - based on both statute and judicial precedent.Ex-Cyber wrote:I'm interested primarily in the opinions of judges, not lawyers. Lawyers' opinions are just advice; judges' opinions are binding interpretations of the law.
Sick of sub-par Dreamcast web browsers that fail to impress? Visit Psilocybin Dreams!
-
- DCEmu Cool Newbie
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 7:44 pm
- Location: The Lower East Side of Manhattan.
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0