Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
- hey911
- DCEmu Junior
- Posts: 45
- https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2008 10:50 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
So, is the modern day concept of race biologically/medically valid?
Please note that I'm asking as a topic starter, not because I'm unaware of the facts...
Please note that I'm asking as a topic starter, not because I'm unaware of the facts...
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
I gotta go clock in, so here goes.
NO...
Reputable sources:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=race-in-a-bottle
http://www.pbs.org/race/000_General/000_00-Home.htm
NO...
Reputable sources:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=race-in-a-bottle
http://www.pbs.org/race/000_General/000_00-Home.htm
-
- DCEmu User with No Life
- Posts: 3641
- Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
My understanding is this: the concept of a reproductively-isolated population with identifiable genetic characteristics is valid, but in practice that has damn near nothing to do with the social construct of "race" (which is based mostly on a weird mix of facial features, skin color, and culture/ethnicity).
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
- FamilyGuy
- Insane DCEmu
- Posts: 132
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 10:53 pm
- Has thanked: 3 times
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
AFAIK the difference between skin colors doesn't create a new race, not more thant the color of the eyes or of the hairs. To be of a new race one would have to be genetically really more different than simply of a different skin-color. A black and a white labrador dog are still labrador dogs, ain't they?
Is racism colorism then?
By the way, that's just my humble understanding of genetics, I could be wrong.
FG
Is racism colorism then?
By the way, that's just my humble understanding of genetics, I could be wrong.
FG
- not just souLLy now
- DCEmu Respected
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
HI WE'RE NOT DOING YOUR HOMEWORK FOR YOU. KTHX.
-
- Jeeba Jabba
- Posts: 9106
- Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2001 7:00 am
- Location: New Orleans, Louisiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
of course its valid.
why else do white people control the world.
why else do white people control the world.
"He who cannot draw on 3,000 years is living hand-to-mouth." -Goethe
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
I'm sorry, I didn't mean to make is seem like I was doing homework.
By the way the C.D. in my sig is "Charles Darwin". Thank God, u-said-it didn't link to Wikipedia...
Whats up with people always quoting Wikipedia anyway? You do know they're just a middle man to the real info...
I'll come up with something more interesting to talk about next time.
By the way the C.D. in my sig is "Charles Darwin". Thank God, u-said-it didn't link to Wikipedia...
Whats up with people always quoting Wikipedia anyway? You do know they're just a middle man to the real info...
I'll come up with something more interesting to talk about next time.
- Roofus
- President & CEO Roofuscorp, LLC
- Posts: 9898
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 11:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
Unlike sexual orientation, race is a lifestyle choice.
-
- DCEmu Webmaster
- Posts: 16379
- Joined: Wed Mar 14, 2001 6:00 pm
- Location: New Orleans, LA
- Has thanked: 111 times
- Been thanked: 91 times
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
When did Off-Topic turn into Null/Junk?
It's thinking...
- Quzar
- Dream Coder
- Posts: 7499
- Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 12:14 am
- Location: Miami, FL
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 10 times
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
Mid/late 2001.|darc| wrote:When did Off-Topic turn into Null/Junk?
"When you post fewer lines of text than your signature, consider not posting at all." - A Wise Man
- Stormwatch
- DCEmu Fan
- Posts: 2090
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2002 11:55 pm
- Location: Brazil
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
If this was posted in Null, I'd guess it'd get non-serious pseudo-racist replies, like /b/.
Lines join in faint discord and the Stormwatch brews
. . a concert of Kings as the white sea snaps
. . at the heels of a soft prayer
. . whispered
. . a concert of Kings as the white sea snaps
. . at the heels of a soft prayer
. . whispered
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
My favorite example of why the modern conception of race people discuss is invalid is this: you used to be able to change race by crossing certain state lines, depending on your family origins.
Of course, the fact that what race is which varies on who and where it is asked also proves this.
Of course, the fact that what race is which varies on who and where it is asked also proves this.
How to be a Conservative:
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
On that same note: Would women be inferior to men, "social" inequalities wouldn't exist even between "white" groups of people?Jeeba Jabba wrote:of course its valid.
why else do white people control the world.
Code: Select all
1. If one group of people has genes present that account for red, orange, yellow, green, and blue eyes.
2. And another group has genes that account for red, pink *chuckles*, yellow, green, and blue.
3. Then 80% of all eye variation exists between the two groups.
So in other words, the majority of differences between any specific "geographical" populations are not the ones usually used to classify people into races. Like skin color (polygenic), hair type, eye color, etc... The difference are factors such as the likelihood of developing cardio-vascular disease, diabetes, sickle-cell anemia, hypertension, alcoholism, skin cancer(s), obesity...
Again the importance of diagnosing a (disease/disease potential) for "anybody", would be based on direct family history, and not racial group identification.
- Wagh
- Wagh
- Posts: 5746
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 7:59 pm
- Location: YSOH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
You are more related to a person of another race than someone of your own.
It is all stupid anyways.
There are genetic differences but for random things. ( like the cystic fibrosis gene in African blacks ).
It is all stupid anyways.
There are genetic differences but for random things. ( like the cystic fibrosis gene in African blacks ).
Bush and Hussein together in bed
Giving H-E-A-D head
Y'all motherfuckers heard what we said
Billions made and millions dead
Giving H-E-A-D head
Y'all motherfuckers heard what we said
Billions made and millions dead
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
I'm going to call shenanigans on that one. I think that's a claim along the lines of "people only use 10% of their brains!"You are more related to a person of another race than someone of your own.
How to be a Conservative:
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
- Wagh
- Wagh
- Posts: 5746
- Joined: Fri Nov 08, 2002 7:59 pm
- Location: YSOH
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
Well. It's not just some "claim". The statement is made by Spencer Wells in the book Deep Ancestry. He heads the The Genographic Project. I'd say he has enough knowledge to make such a statement.Lartrak wrote:I'm going to call shenanigans on that one. I think that's a claim along the lines of "people only use 10% of their brains!"You are more related to a person of another race than someone of your own.
Bush and Hussein together in bed
Giving H-E-A-D head
Y'all motherfuckers heard what we said
Billions made and millions dead
Giving H-E-A-D head
Y'all motherfuckers heard what we said
Billions made and millions dead
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
When I said that 85% of all variation exists between all people, I didn't mean that someone you'd call a different race had the other 15% of variation. Humans and Chimpanzees share 97-98% of their Genome, and humans are 99.9% alike. After all, there are parts of our genome that don't vary. The 85% is just in reference to the sequences that do.
By the way variation is referring to an alternative version of a gene that can exist at a given loci. = Allele.
What it means is that say a certain percentage of that, the other 15% is distributed locally among a geographically distinct groups. Like one of the pacific island chains having 0.2 to 0.5% of genetic variation not seen anywhere else in the world, but not with all of that 15% in one place.
For anyone interested, there are educational DVD/VHS tapes being distributed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute for "Free" to residents in the continental United States. Some of the dvds have very good lectures on the level of High School Senior/Pre-College, but are very informative nonetheless. You are required to register, but there are no strings attached. - http://www.hhmi.org/ , go to the "Catalog" section.
I personally recommend these Lecture/Lab Dvds - Scanning Life's Matrix, Evolution: Constant Change and Common Threads, Evolution: Fossils, Genes, and Mousetraps
By the way variation is referring to an alternative version of a gene that can exist at a given loci. = Allele.
What it means is that say a certain percentage of that, the other 15% is distributed locally among a geographically distinct groups. Like one of the pacific island chains having 0.2 to 0.5% of genetic variation not seen anywhere else in the world, but not with all of that 15% in one place.
For anyone interested, there are educational DVD/VHS tapes being distributed by the Howard Hughes Medical Institute for "Free" to residents in the continental United States. Some of the dvds have very good lectures on the level of High School Senior/Pre-College, but are very informative nonetheless. You are required to register, but there are no strings attached. - http://www.hhmi.org/ , go to the "Catalog" section.
I personally recommend these Lecture/Lab Dvds - Scanning Life's Matrix, Evolution: Constant Change and Common Threads, Evolution: Fossils, Genes, and Mousetraps
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
Thanks for the link. That book sounds pretty interesting. I still doubt the claim because some racial groups are extremely isolated (though they're a small minority). Probably true for myself though, being white with backgrounds from a multitude of regions.Wagh wrote:Well. It's not just some "claim". The statement is made by Spencer Wells in the book Deep Ancestry. He heads the The Genographic Project. I'd say he has enough knowledge to make such a statement.Lartrak wrote:I'm going to call shenanigans on that one. I think that's a claim along the lines of "people only use 10% of their brains!"You are more related to a person of another race than someone of your own.
Think I'd agree if you said "some people are more closely related to some members of another race than some members of their own". That's a mouthful though.
How to be a Conservative:
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
You have to believe everything that has ever gone wrong in the history of your country was due to Liberals.
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
It might be a little less confusing to say that "you're just as likely to be as genetically different to someone from your own race, than to someone else's".
Out of coincidence I'd also recommend a book and accompanying video, "Journey of Man". - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ofman.html
I saw this a few years ago, and I thought it was great, it didn't pull any punches either. When it comes to science, I prefer to take the facts head on, without the sugar coating.
Out of coincidence I'd also recommend a book and accompanying video, "Journey of Man". - http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news ... ofman.html
I saw this a few years ago, and I thought it was great, it didn't pull any punches either. When it comes to science, I prefer to take the facts head on, without the sugar coating.
- toastman
- Iron Fist of Justice
- Posts: 4933
- Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2001 3:08 am
- Location: New Orleans
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
Re: Is the concept of human race biologically valid?
Not anymore. Humans are too well traveled and connected to each other to promote the biological diversity necessary to split into separate species.
No signature.