Reading that world is ending on 2006, what do you think?
- Dreamcast4life
- DCEmu Nutter
- Posts: 846
- https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 12:24 pm
- Location: monticello,Indiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Reading that world is ending on 2006, what do you think?
I been reading on some evidence that he world is ending in 2006 because the bible code states it. I am kinda convienced and I am pretty scared about it. I mean if you look at the signs of it, you have to be convienced. I would post a link but I don't HTML very well, I am kind illiterate in pc land lol. I would like to know what you think about this and please don't flame religion but to think I am not going to be around much longer has made me really sad.
Have you played dreamcast today?
- Roofus
- President & CEO Roofuscorp, LLC
- Posts: 9898
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 11:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
None of these came true but THIS ONE could be it!!!!!I been reading on some evidence that he world is ending in 2006 because the bible code states it. I am kinda convienced and I am pretty scared about it. I mean if you look at the signs of it, you have to be convienced. I would post a link but I don't HTML very well, I am kind illiterate in pc land lol. I would like to know what you think about this and please don't flame religion but to think I am not going to be around much longer has made me really sad.
Actually, if I was a mod, I'd call you an idiot and lock the topic. Since I'm not a Null mod, I can't lock the topic, but I can still call you an idiot, so here goes:
You are an idiot. You said that you "[are] kind illiterate in pc land lol." You didn't need the "in pc land lol." Based on this post, I'd say you're illiterate in English too.
So to sum up:
1) Stop reading End-of-the-world literature.
2) Take an English class or two.
3) Do this before 2012, which is when the world really ends. The Mayans said so.
- Dreamcast4life
- DCEmu Nutter
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 12:24 pm
- Location: monticello,Indiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
Roofus wrote:None of these came true but THIS ONE could be it!!!!!I been reading on some evidence that he world is ending in 2006 because the bible code states it. I am kinda convienced and I am pretty scared about it. I mean if you look at the signs of it, you have to be convienced. I would post a link but I don't HTML very well, I am kind illiterate in pc land lol. I would like to know what you think about this and please don't flame religion but to think I am not going to be around much longer has made me really sad.
Actually, if I was a mod, I'd call you an idiot and lock the topic. Since I'm not a Null mod, I can't lock the topic, but I can still call you an idiot, so here goes:
You are an idiot. You said that you "[are] kind illiterate in pc land lol." You didn't need the "in pc land lol." Based on this post, I'd say you're illiterate in English too.
So to sum up:
1) Stop reading End-of-the-world literature.
2) Take an English class or two.
3) Do this before 2012, which is when the world really ends. The Mayans said so.
you don't have to make fun of me,sorry that this is a english-perfect forum. I just stated a topic, don't have to make a fuss about something I read,ok? I don't believe the mayan theory but we'll see.
Have you played dreamcast today?
- melancholy
- DCEmu's Ace Attorney
- Posts: 10969
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:34 am
- Location: Indiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Dreamcast4life
- DCEmu Nutter
- Posts: 846
- Joined: Mon May 30, 2005 12:24 pm
- Location: monticello,Indiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- popley
- Psychotic DCEmu
- Posts: 591
- Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2003 5:42 am
- Location: Colorado
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
I hope so.
"It's only after we've lost everything, that we are truly free to do anything." Fight Club
http://www.geocities.com/nesterdcgamecodes
http://www.geocities.com/nesterdcgamecodes
- Roofus
- President & CEO Roofuscorp, LLC
- Posts: 9898
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2002 11:42 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
We got by for 10,000 years without petroleum. Life would be radically different, to be sure but I don't think petroleum is critical to the survival of the human race.melancholy wrote:I think the world will end when oil runs out. Actually, the Earth will still be here, but humans probably won't.
Of course, if they ever come up with a viable alternative, it becomes a moot pont.
Either way, as the Borg say, "We will adapt."
- greay
- DCEmu Ultra Poster
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:59 am
- Location: 24 hours from Tulsa
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
You said the world is going to end! Of course we're going to make a fuss!Dreamcast4life wrote:Roofus wrote:None of these came true but THIS ONE could be it!!!!!I been reading on some evidence that he world is ending in 2006 because the bible code states it. I am kinda convienced and I am pretty scared about it. I mean if you look at the signs of it, you have to be convienced. I would post a link but I don't HTML very well, I am kind illiterate in pc land lol. I would like to know what you think about this and please don't flame religion but to think I am not going to be around much longer has made me really sad.
Actually, if I was a mod, I'd call you an idiot and lock the topic. Since I'm not a Null mod, I can't lock the topic, but I can still call you an idiot, so here goes:
You are an idiot. You said that you "[are] kind illiterate in pc land lol." You didn't need the "in pc land lol." Based on this post, I'd say you're illiterate in English too.
So to sum up:
1) Stop reading End-of-the-world literature.
2) Take an English class or two.
3) Do this before 2012, which is when the world really ends. The Mayans said so.
you don't have to make fun of me,sorry that this is a english-perfect forum. I just stated a topic, don't have to make a fuss about something I read,ok? I don't believe the mayan theory but we'll see.
But let's put this in perspective. You said this was based on the Bible Code, right? Well, the guy who came up with that predicts a comet will anhillate all life on earth in 2012, so we have a little bit of time. While we're waiting, let's take a look at this Bible Code stuff.
The author of the bible code wrote:
Is this true? Well, here is a story of someone making a successful prediction with War and Peace. Precisely the book that Drosnin said did not contain these codes. here is more on War and Peace. And another pageMichael Drosnin wrote:Consistently, the Bible Code brings together interlocking words that reveal related information. With Bill Clinton, President. With the Moon landing, spaceship and Apollo 11. With Hitler, Nazi. With Kennedy, Dallas. In experiment after experiment, the crossword puzzles were found only in the Bible. Not in War and Peace, not in any other book, and not in 10 million computer-generated test cases.
well, whaddya know, someone did it.Michael Drosnin wrote: When my critics find a message about the assassination of a prime minister encrypted in Moby Dick, I'll believe them.
I'm a lone wolf looking for trouble.
- mikozero
- DCEmu Cool Poster
- Posts: 1114
- Joined: Thu Jul 22, 2004 9:50 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
apart from plastic production, theres no need to get worked up about petroleum running out, unless you like shortsighted panic.
you can grow diesel (well an equivalent) and one benefit of that is it only puts out the gas emissions it absorbed the year before whilst growing, the net envioromental impact is zero. (not to mention it would give the countryside employment back)
and don't get me started on straw powered power stations (which are a great idea) or geothermal (which is even better but hugely underdeveloped).
the truth about our current enery usage is that its setup to line the pockets of the few.
misinformation abounds and the public are steered away from ideas they should really know more about.
take 'wind power' in the UK,
people have been convinced not to want it, phrases like 'blot on the landscape' are fed into the public consciousness, the electricity companys look for sites close to rural residental sites or areas of natural beauty as to generate complaints and a negative arua around the idea because they stand to benefit from the high pricing you justify using a non-renewable or highly dangerous resource (like nuclear) yet all the real (buried) studys said put them out at sea and use the technology/skillbase from the (depleting) oil industry to do the leg work.
furthermore people regularly state that you'd only get electricty 'when the wind blows' which is a total fallacy for two reasons -
1. it nearly always blows at sea (hence sailing ships).
2. when its not blowing you use hydro electric, when the wind is blowing but no one is using it ('low peak') you use the generated power to pump the water back up to the high reservoirs in the hydro systems (the electricity companys already do this at low peak with the few hydro schemes they've been 'forced' to run under goverment rules).
hydro schemes are the UPS's (or backup batterys) of wind power, but they must be developed in tandem.
needless to say this is UK specific, but the point is still the same, big business is on it's side not yours, and the ideas which would benefit all more than the few are buried, underdeveloped and hidden from the public consiousness.
and . . . . breath
you can grow diesel (well an equivalent) and one benefit of that is it only puts out the gas emissions it absorbed the year before whilst growing, the net envioromental impact is zero. (not to mention it would give the countryside employment back)
and don't get me started on straw powered power stations (which are a great idea) or geothermal (which is even better but hugely underdeveloped).
the truth about our current enery usage is that its setup to line the pockets of the few.
misinformation abounds and the public are steered away from ideas they should really know more about.
take 'wind power' in the UK,
people have been convinced not to want it, phrases like 'blot on the landscape' are fed into the public consciousness, the electricity companys look for sites close to rural residental sites or areas of natural beauty as to generate complaints and a negative arua around the idea because they stand to benefit from the high pricing you justify using a non-renewable or highly dangerous resource (like nuclear) yet all the real (buried) studys said put them out at sea and use the technology/skillbase from the (depleting) oil industry to do the leg work.
furthermore people regularly state that you'd only get electricty 'when the wind blows' which is a total fallacy for two reasons -
1. it nearly always blows at sea (hence sailing ships).
2. when its not blowing you use hydro electric, when the wind is blowing but no one is using it ('low peak') you use the generated power to pump the water back up to the high reservoirs in the hydro systems (the electricity companys already do this at low peak with the few hydro schemes they've been 'forced' to run under goverment rules).
hydro schemes are the UPS's (or backup batterys) of wind power, but they must be developed in tandem.
needless to say this is UK specific, but the point is still the same, big business is on it's side not yours, and the ideas which would benefit all more than the few are buried, underdeveloped and hidden from the public consiousness.
and . . . . breath
Last edited by mikozero on Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:26 am, edited 2 times in total.
- melancholy
- DCEmu's Ace Attorney
- Posts: 10969
- Joined: Mon Nov 26, 2001 12:34 am
- Location: Indiana
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
You cannot deny that it will wipe out a hell of a lot of people in this country, though, if no alternative is created.Roofus wrote:We got by for 10,000 years without petroleum. Life would be radically different, to be sure but I don't think petroleum is critical to the survival of the human race.melancholy wrote:I think the world will end when oil runs out. Actually, the Earth will still be here, but humans probably won't.
Of course, if they ever come up with a viable alternative, it becomes a moot pont.
Either way, as the Borg say, "We will adapt."
- Nyarlathotep
- Soul Sold for DCEmu
- Posts: 7390
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2002 1:37 pm
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
I've never read the Bible code, but I happen to know that the modern King James bible (which I believe is the 'standard' edition for protestants) is an english translation of a german edition of a roman translation of a greek edition of a hebrew translation of a text that was originally written in a number of different languages including greek, aramiac, hebrew and latin, which was a book authored by multiple different people over a period of centuries from multiple oral sources.
Yet apparently there's a code in there that's got through undiluted through all those revisions and editions? Puh-leese.
Yet apparently there's a code in there that's got through undiluted through all those revisions and editions? Puh-leese.
- greay
- DCEmu Ultra Poster
- Posts: 1938
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2004 10:59 am
- Location: 24 hours from Tulsa
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
The code is done with the Hebrew, not the KJV. So while the legitimacy of the source text argument is still a valid one, it's not an especially strong one.
edit -- I should have said that I know it's done on the Hebrew for the Old Testament (Torah) but I'm not sure about the New Testament. I think they use the Hebrew for that, as well, and one could allow them not using the original language for those parts that weren't originally in the language, given that it's a Hebrew God that put the code there.
edit # 2 -- it's just the Torah. He's Jewish.
edit -- I should have said that I know it's done on the Hebrew for the Old Testament (Torah) but I'm not sure about the New Testament. I think they use the Hebrew for that, as well, and one could allow them not using the original language for those parts that weren't originally in the language, given that it's a Hebrew God that put the code there.
edit # 2 -- it's just the Torah. He's Jewish.
Last edited by greay on Wed Nov 30, 2005 8:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm a lone wolf looking for trouble.
- not just souLLy now
- DCEmu Respected
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times
- Specially Cork
- Moderator
- Posts: 11632
- Joined: Fri Apr 05, 2002 10:01 am
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 8 times
-
- bleemcast! Creator
- Posts: 882
- Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 7:44 pm
- Location: Los Angeles, CA
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
- not just souLLy now
- DCEmu Respected
- Posts: 4070
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2004 5:53 pm
- Location: UK
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 3 times