Large HDDs in old computers. (Network Attached Storage)

Talk about anything and everything not related to this site or the Dreamcast, such as news stories, political discussion, or anything else. If there's not a forum for it, it belongs in here. Also, be warned that personal insults, threats, and spamming will not be tolerated.
Post Reply
sixteen-bit
Hardware Freak
Hardware Freak
Posts: 3246
https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2001 3:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Large HDDs in old computers. (Network Attached Storage)

Post by sixteen-bit »

Long story short, my desktop PC is down and needs new parts. I can't afford said parts at this time of year but I'd like to access files on the 10 and 120GB disks from the PC. I've considered buying an external enclosure and putting the disks in there but since my current computer is a laptop with only USB 1.1 I'm looking at an investment of at least ?45 just to access my data. I could fix up my desktop for that sort of money and I don't want this to cost me anything.

I have an old computer available; A Pentium 120MHz, 80MB, 2x1GB... pretty obsolete. Is there any way I could convince it to use my 10 and 120G hard disks and subsequently serve them out over my LAN?
I'd also like to use my CD burner again ("omg Pentium 120 burning CDs, lols...") but that's something for another day.
Gmc
DCEmu User with No Life
DCEmu User with No Life
Posts: 3446
Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2001 7:44 pm
Location: England
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Re: Large HDDs in old computers. (Network Attached Storage)

Post by Gmc »

sixteen-bit wrote:Long story short, my desktop PC is down and needs new parts. I can't afford said parts at this time of year but I'd like to access files on the 10 and 120GB disks from the PC. I've considered buying an external enclosure and putting the disks in there but since my current computer is a laptop with only USB 1.1 I'm looking at an investment of at least ?45 just to access my data. I could fix up my desktop for that sort of money and I don't want this to cost me anything.

I have an old computer available; A Pentium 120MHz, 80MB, 2x1GB... pretty obsolete. Is there any way I could convince it to use my 10 and 120G hard disks and subsequently serve them out over my LAN?
I'd also like to use my CD burner again ("omg Pentium 120 burning CDs, lols...") but that's something for another day.
You could get a linux build running on that old system, and probably serve files off your big HD's over a LAN. Ask in the Linux forum, they'll be able to show you what builds are best for old computers and stuff.
Image
User avatar
Raijin Z
Insane DCEmu
Insane DCEmu
Posts: 297
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2005 2:11 pm
Location: Ohio
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0
Contact:

Post by Raijin Z »

10 yes, 120... hell no.

Yes, you could burn CDs with that system.
bizzle
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by bizzle »

If you can find a PCI IDE controller you can do it.
User avatar
butters
Classic Games Lover
Classic Games Lover
Posts: 5088
Joined: Fri Feb 08, 2002 6:50 pm
Location: Lubbock, Texas, United States, Sol 3, Milky Way Galaxy
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by butters »

But the mobo will have problems with it correct?
sixteen-bit
Hardware Freak
Hardware Freak
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2001 3:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by sixteen-bit »

Butters wrote:But the mobo will have problems with it correct?
A friend was doing something very similar with a P166 recently; Running Linux, he had something like 80G + 20 + something else online. Up until a few hours ago I was considering doing the same until I realised I can get a used Athlon 800 base unit from a friend for as much as a PCI IDE controller is going to cost me.

I don't need a whole base unit but it's either my mainboard or CPU that's dead and I'm leaning to mainboard..
bizzle
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by bizzle »

sixteen-bit wrote:
Butters wrote:But the mobo will have problems with it correct?
A friend was doing something very similar with a P166 recently; Running Linux, he had something like 80G + 20 + something else online. Up until a few hours ago I was considering doing the same until I realised I can get a used Athlon 800 base unit from a friend for as much as a PCI IDE controller is going to cost me.

I don't need a whole base unit but it's either my mainboard or CPU that's dead and I'm leaning to mainboard..
You can't find a used PCI IDE controller cheap on ebay?
Ex-Cyber
DCEmu User with No Life
DCEmu User with No Life
Posts: 3641
Joined: Sat Feb 16, 2002 1:55 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Ex-Cyber »

But the mobo will have problems with it correct?
Drive size limits depend on the BIOS and operating system, mostly (IIRC, the main barriers are at 528MB, 2GB, 4GB, 8GB, 32GB, and 137GB, depending on which particular set of shortcomings your BIOS/OS has). A lot of people will tell you that you absolutely must get an Ultra ATA 133 card to use drives bigger than 137GB, but that's simply not true. It's a good idea (especially because these cards usually come with their own BIOS extensions), but it's not a requirement; in general any ATA controller that is not completely braindead should be able to talk to any ATA device in PIO mode, although DMA support could be broken for various reasons.
"You know, I have a great, wonderful, really original method of teaching antitrust law, and it kept 80 percent of the students awake. They learned things. It was fabulous." -- Justice Stephen Breyer
Pyrosurfer
DCEmu Nutter
DCEmu Nutter
Posts: 964
Joined: Sun Aug 11, 2002 5:07 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by Pyrosurfer »

I run a Pentium 200mhz with win98 as a ftp server. I installed a 120GB hdd in it and it works fine. Using the software included with the hdd usually gets past the bios/mobo/os limits.
User avatar
Quzar
Dream Coder
Dream Coder
Posts: 7499
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 12:14 am
Location: Miami, FL
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Post by Quzar »

I researched this quite a bit and there is no way to get it to work like a true NAT device(you know, the actual NAT machines) but you can easily put either an older windows or linux and have some sort of filesharing going on. In fact, I did that using nullsoft's WASTE, which is kind of like a p2p but is only client to client so it works well over a small network.
"When you post fewer lines of text than your signature, consider not posting at all." - A Wise Man
sixteen-bit
Hardware Freak
Hardware Freak
Posts: 3246
Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2001 3:45 pm
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by sixteen-bit »

quzar wrote:I researched this quite a bit and there is no way to get it to work like a true NAT device(you know, the actual NAT machines) but you can easily put either an older windows or linux and have some sort of filesharing going on.
Yeah, I originally wanted to get some SAMBA fun going on and serve out the files over LAN. I'm abandoning the idea because it looks like I can get a cheap PC Chips mainboard to fix my main computer.

Yeah, yeah I know PC Chips.. but it's cheap. Like "two bigmacs" cheap.
bizzle
Has thanked: 0
Been thanked: 0

Post by bizzle »

Heh, I had a PC Chips motherboard in my old Celeron box. AFAIK PC Chips and ECS are both manufactured at the same plants and they use the same designs. The PC Chips motherboard I had was flashable to an ECS model which had a much more stable BIOS.
User avatar
Quzar
Dream Coder
Dream Coder
Posts: 7499
Joined: Wed Jul 31, 2002 12:14 am
Location: Miami, FL
Has thanked: 4 times
Been thanked: 10 times
Contact:

Post by Quzar »

Xylene wrote:Heh, I had a PC Chips motherboard in my old Celeron box. AFAIK PC Chips and ECS are both manufactured at the same plants and they use the same designs. The PC Chips motherboard I had was flashable to an ECS model which had a much more stable BIOS.
There are three or four other brands that are simply rebranded ECS/PC Chips boards. I think one's name is Alpina or something like that.
"When you post fewer lines of text than your signature, consider not posting at all." - A Wise Man
Post Reply