Biggest low budget movie you ever saw.

politoe · Post by **politoe** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:18 am

Damn

This movie called La Taqueria has gots to be the biggest pice of shit movie you can ever see. It has everything. Border Brothers, pimps, bums, hicks, fags, name it. You'll see everything in this big low buget movie. The lamest acting you'll ever see. They use a home video camera to record the movie, you can hear the other effects more than the people talking (ie. water running down the sink, the wind outddors.) If you have nothing better to do for an hour and a half, go to your video store and rent this piece of shit movie, you'll laugh your ass off.

Well heres my quick description to this.

Now for the other people. What was the worst lo budget movie you have ever seen in your life????[/b]

Post by **Specially Cork** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:22 am

Blair Witch

And it was crap.

feels · Post by **feels** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:24 am

I believe My Big Fat Greek Wedding was dirt cheap. A pretty good romantic.

politoe · Post by **politoe** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:29 am

Come on these movie you guys are talking about are OSCAR winners compared to this. Watch this movie and you'll change your mind.

The Kron · Post by **The Kron** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 5:20 am

Clerks, very very good

scottymac · Post by **scottymac** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:37 am

Cube was great.

Cube 2: Hypercube---Well, #1 there was no need for a sequel #2 it was very poor, really soils the memory of an interesting low budget movie. #3.......

SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER SPOILER

It leaves you with the impression that there's going to be a Cube 3

please no!!!!

liltimmyw · Post by **liltimmyw** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:41 am

Let's see

Clerks is great. And I liked Blair Witch Project.

Another low budget movie is Donnie Darko. They only had $2 million, which isn't that much for a movie. And Donnie Darko is the best movie ever so yeah.

Mugworm_Griblick · Post by **Mugworm_Griblick** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 11:42 am

liltimmyw · Post by **liltimmyw** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 12:34 pm

Mugworm_Griblick wrote:Pi

Pi is great. I love it.

Firthy2002 · Post by **Firthy2002** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 3:39 pm

Clerks.

Luriden · Post by **Luriden** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:10 pm

Dumb And Dumberer looks kinda stupid and low budget if you ask me. When the sequel to a movie doesn't use the original actors then that usually means something. Or maybe they used different actors since it's supposed to be a "prequel", I dunno. The new actors look nothing like Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels though.

Gmc · Post by **Gmc** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:16 pm

Dumb And Dumberer looks kinda stupid and low budget if you ask me. When the sequel to a movie doesn't use the original actors then that usually means something. Or maybe they used different actors since it's supposed to be a "prequel", I dunno. The new actors look nothing like Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels though.

Yea, they wouldnt have been able to use the original actors, it would not have worked right at all, as it IS a prequel. Mind you the film isint all that good, Dumb and Dumber is a lot better.

Luriden · Post by **Luriden** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 4:20 pm

Gmc wrote:
Dumb And Dumberer looks kinda stupid and low budget if you ask me. When the sequel to a movie doesn't use the original actors then that usually means something. Or maybe they used different actors since it's supposed to be a "prequel", I dunno. The new actors look nothing like Jim Carrey and Jeff Daniels though.
Yea, they wouldnt have been able to use the original actors, it would not have worked right at all, as it IS a prequel. Mind you the film isint all that good, Dumb and Dumber is a lot better.

I haven't seen it, but I can agree with you that the previews didn't look that funny at all, too much slapstick humor. It's just not the same without Jim Carrey.

FETUS · Post by **FETUS** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:09 pm

GWAR movies
skulhedface is probably the best but they all look like they have $2000 budget
considering the lead singer paints houses to make some extra money I think it might be less

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:48 pm

Wow. Donnie Darko only had $2mil? Whats even more incredible is that that movie was shot on 35mm, which would comsume at least $2mil.

The Evil Dead: $425k. Very polished for a movie of its budget at its time. A lot of great horror movies were made for next to nothing. (Night of the Living Dead & Texas Chainsaw Massacare come to mind).

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:50 pm

BTW, Dumb and Dumberer was made for 20-30 mil. I'm not sure of the exact number, but 27 comes to mind.

Post by **pixel** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 7:57 pm

If La Taqueria has boobs in it, ill watch it

liltimmyw · Post by **liltimmyw** » Sat Jun 21, 2003 8:05 pm

jaredfogle wrote:Wow. Donnie Darko only had $2mil? Whats even more incredible is that that movie was shot on 35mm, which would comsume at least $2mil.

That's what the director said in the commentary on the DVD.

Drinkcast · Post by **Drinkcast** » Sun Jun 22, 2003 1:51 am

The Never Ending Story III.
It makes me want to kill myself.

CoasterKing · Post by **CoasterKing** » Sun Jun 22, 2003 9:44 am

I know you asked for the worst but everyone else is putting the best and since I dont' tend to remember crap movies that I've seen i'll do the same

Rocky was a great low budget movie (not the crap sequels)

Chasing Amy, Clerks

Trainspotting & shallow Grave

Bad Taste

Blair Witch Project

Pi

The original Halloween, a real classic.

Eraserhead which was made for ~ ?16k

Reservoir Dogs - $1.2 million

And lastly Enter the Dragon. Bruce Lee > you

All of the above are great viewing. If you push me for a worst I would say Plan 9 from outer space.