![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_eek.gif)
I seem to remember reviews pretty much berating it...but was it essentially another Sonic Adventure, with the same sorts of flaws as SA1 & 2, or was there more to it than that?
The Sonic Advance games were good...which is ironic, considering the fact that they were outsourced to Dimps. The Sonic Rush games for DS are also okay gameplay wise, with two major exceptions: (1) they bog you down with a ton of cutscenes and (2) there are several bottomless pits in the level design. Sonic Advance 1 & 2 were very much a return to form, though.Nico0020 wrote:just played the demo of sonic unleashed. god awful terrible. it is on auto pilot most the time. then you push x and it plays the game even more for you, plowing through everything. I have given up on sega ever making a good sonic game again.
The story has *always* been stupid in Sonic games, which is why it's so maddening that they seem to focus more and more on it. And it just all went to hell with Sonic Adventure, when they moved things to Earth and...well, they have stuck with the understated, implied-from-gameplay story of the Genesis games. Evil scientist/dictator conquers and industrializes planet, turns populace into robot minions.Eviltaco64X wrote:I personally liked the Sonic Adventure games a lot.
Sonic 360/PS3 I absolutely can't stand. The controls are so awkward and the story is horrible (not to say Sonic games ever had amazing stories).