The Massive, Legendary HOT GIRLS THREAD!

jebeebus · Post by **jebeebus** » Wed Dec 18, 2002 12:59 pm

:upskirt: BUMP!

AmadeusZull · Post by **AmadeusZull** » Wed Dec 18, 2002 3:49 pm

Narcissus wrote:
???K ??G?? wrote:This thread is HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!
This thread makes me huge....

same here i oscilate when i get here. get big then lil again, then turn to next page big again then lil again. many tissues were sacraficed.

Hawq · Post by **Hawq** » Thu Dec 19, 2002 2:42 pm

page 2

how did this happen?

Post by **Roofus** » Thu Dec 19, 2002 6:37 pm

Calavera · Post by **Calavera** » Fri Dec 20, 2002 9:51 pm

Why is this topic fading away? It seems like people are posting less and less. If nobody posts then one day it will be locked like the old off-topic threads.

MetalGearRay · Post by **MetalGearRay** » Sat Dec 21, 2002 2:24 am

I agree. This thread is declining in quality, we need to post more hot girls!

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sat Dec 21, 2002 6:34 am

???K ??G?? wrote:This thread is HUGE!!!!!!!!!!!!

WHO CARES ABOUT THE SIZE IT FREAKIN RULES

.

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sat Dec 21, 2002 1:10 pm

AmadeusZull DAMN dude that chick you posted ton of pics of is HOT AS HECK, GOD, THANK YOU SOOO MUCH AmadeusZull.
I will have to start posting some pics too, this thread freakin rulez

.

Post by **Roofus** » Sat Dec 21, 2002 5:26 pm

Associated Press wrote:Centerfolds Less Curvaceous
Dec 19, 4:04 PM EST

The curves of Playboy centerfold models have gradually flattened out over the last 50 years, giving way to a more androgynous look, European researchers suggest.

Analyzing every Playboy centerfold since the first one in 1953, they found the models' weight hadn't changed much over time, but busts and hips had diminished, while waists had become less tapered.

The study, published this week in the traditionally lighthearted Christmas edition of the British Medical Journal, does not offer much interpretation of the trend and experts warn against jumping to conclusions.

Does it mean the male idea of female attractiveness has changed over time that men now prefer a less curvaceous woman, despite their protests that "heroin chic" is not sexy?

Or were the evolutionary scientists who theorized that curves symbolized fertility and that the most reproductively successful females were those who were able to store surplus energy in their curves wrong?

Or have humans now evolved beyond such primitive judgments as the ability to make it through famine?

Or is it simply that Playboy is now out of touch with what men find attractive?

"It's difficult to disentangle cause from effect," said the study's leader, Martin Voracek, a psychology researcher at the University of Vienna in Austria. "All I can say is that attractiveness is not that simple and is not constant over time."

"If Playboy didn't reflect ideals of attractiveness, they wouldn't still be around, so it must be that many men find this shape attractive," Voracek speculated.

However, Adrian Furnham, a professor of psychology at London University who has conducted research on judgments of female attractiveness, was not so ready to draw conclusions.

"I would have thought that to make any deductions would be highly dubious. Some years ago Playboy was the touchstone, but there are now dozens of these things around," he said. "You'd need a whole range of magazines from different countries which showed a consistent pattern. Then, I think, you could start worrying about an explanation, but until then it's just a bit of fun."

It's not as if the Playboy centerfolds are indistinguishable from bony catwalk models, Voracek said, "but at least over the last 15 years or so, there is some sort of converging trend."

Playboy spokesman Bill Farley acknowledged the curves on the centerfolds have changed.

"In the 1950s and into the '60s, the cultural norm was more of the hourglass figure Marilyn Monroe, Jayne Mansfield. That was reflected in the pages of Playboy. As time has gone on and women have become more athletic, more in the business world and more inclined to put themselves through fitness regimes, their bodies have changed, and we reflect that as well," he said.

Many models these days tend to have thinner lower bodies.

"But I would think that no one with eyes to see would consider playmates to be androgynous," Farley said.

JDCreationz · Post by **JDCreationz** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:31 am

Could this really be the one year Anniversary of the Hot Girls Thread?!

ShadowofBob · Post by **ShadowofBob** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 5:25 pm

Happy Birthday Hot Girls Thread! Everyone post pics!

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 5:29 pm

J LO OH YEAH

[/url]

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 5:35 pm

AmadeusZull · Post by **AmadeusZull** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 5:57 pm

xxlenigma wrote:

JUST SPLENDID. happy B-Day!!!!

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 6:20 pm

Heres some more pics for you folks LETS KEEP THIS THREAD ALIVE, and kicking

daisyboy13 · Post by **daisyboy13** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 6:23 pm

I've got a ton of great pics, but not quite sure how to post them, help me out.[/img]

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 6:39 pm

Now for some just regular hotties

AmadeusZull · Post by **AmadeusZull** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 6:44 pm

shit you trying to break my dick or something? dang, i love wet lesbian kisses.

Post by **Roofus** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:17 pm

...And for Zull...

xxlenigma · Post by **xxlenigma** » Sun Dec 22, 2002 11:23 pm

Hey can someone post some great sites where we can get hot chick pics that are really great quality

.

P.S. NO PORN, and all the SITES MUST BE FREE THANKS

The Massive, Legendary HOT GIRLS THREAD!

AmadeusZull's PICS.............WOW

More J-LO ;0)

Re: More J-LO ;0)

Sarah Michelle Gellar