Stuck for reasons to hate the United States of America?

Cammyfan · Post by **Cammyfan** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:08 am

Americans are brainwashed into believing that their domination is good for the planet. That is similar to the Nazi Germans believing that their domination was good for the planet. World leadership is just a nicer term for World domination.

Post by **Christuserloeser** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 4:14 am

We all need our enemies, don't we ? One has that muslim, the other jews and Bush is "similar" to Hitler. Life can be so easy if you know your enemy.

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:06 am

Cammyfan wrote:Americans are brainwashed into believing that their domination is good for the planet. That is similar to the Nazi Germans believing that their domination was good for the planet. World leadership is just a nicer term for World domination.

Just lie back and stop struggling, buddy.

It wont hurt.

Nico0020 · Post by **Nico0020** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:28 am

Nope. I am just not oblivious to the fact that the USA is attempting to dominate the world.

If the US was attempting to dominate the world it could have been done many times over. All your responces are just uneducated rants.

Smurph · Post by **Smurph** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:42 am

Nico0020 wrote:
Nope. I am just not oblivious to the fact that the USA is attempting to dominate the world.
If the US was attempting to dominate the world it could have been done many times over. All your responces are just uneducated rants.

Very true.

Post by **Roofus** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 12:06 pm

Cammyfan wrote:Americans are brainwashed into believing that their domination is good for the planet. That is similar to the Nazi Germans believing that their domination was good for the planet. World leadership is just a nicer term for World domination.

I love you.

Cammyfan · Post by **Cammyfan** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 8:57 pm

Not uneducated. US is trying to dominate with style. This way they can get away with it.

Post by **Roofus** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 10:02 pm

Cammyfan wrote:Not uneducated. US is trying to dominate with style. This way they can get away with it.

You enjoy your marijuana and gay marriages. We are in the endtimes now and we'll see which nation GOD favors when He comes.

Smurph · Post by **Smurph** » Sat Feb 18, 2006 11:40 pm

Cammyfan wrote:Not uneducated. US is trying to dominate with style. This way they can get away with it.

I dominated your mom with style last night.

Cammyfan · Post by **Cammyfan** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:00 am

Is everyone that goes against your views flamed Smurph? Do you always attack the character of the person you are arguing with when you have nothing else to say? Roofus I have read much of what you have posted here for years so I respect you. I will not flame you Roofus. I do not agree with any nation having too much power. Gay marriage and marijuana usage is personal choice that varies from person to person. Personally, I do not care about those at all. At least the US is a better choice for World domination than the Nazi Germans, Terrorist Muslims, Russian Communists or Chinese Communists. US domination would be bearable but a better occurrence would be no domination by any country at all. All of those other categories on the other hand would be completely unbearable. I am atheist Roofus. God will not favour any country due to his non-existence.

farrell2k · Post by **farrell2k** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 12:09 am

AgentGreen wrote:
farrell2k wrote:ludacris
http://www.misionurbana.com/artistas/Lu ... 4_1024.jpg

The word you're looking for is "ludicrous." I'm seeing that glaring mistake more and more lately.

Nope. I meant ludacris. Thank you for trying to correct me, though.

Post by **Christuserloeser** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 3:56 am

Let me rephrase that:

Cammyfan wrote:a better occurrence would be no domination [...] at all

Very true.

However to acchieve that we all have to go down the long road for a world without borders. I am sure it will happen someday, it just won't come if we don't fight for it.

Cammyfan · Post by **Cammyfan** » Sun Feb 19, 2006 4:20 am

I definitely agree with you Christuserloeser.

az_bont · Post by **az_bont** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:22 pm

Smurph wrote:
Nico0020 wrote:
Nope. I am just not oblivious to the fact that the USA is attempting to dominate the world.
If the US was attempting to dominate the world it could have been done many times over. All your responces are just uneducated rants.
Very true.

It took two attempts and the support of three allied nations to take over Iraq; a third world country with a population of 26 million and a poorly-equipped army.

There isn't a chance in hell of it happening.

Covar · Post by **Covar** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 2:50 pm

az_bont wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Nico0020 wrote:
Nope. I am just not oblivious to the fact that the USA is attempting to dominate the world.
If the US was attempting to dominate the world it could have been done many times over. All your responces are just uneducated rants.
Very true.
It took two attempts and the support of three allied nations to take over Iraq; a third world country with a population of 26 million and a poorly-equipped army.

There isn't a chance in hell of it happening.

Iraq was in the top 3 of biggest threats to the US since the first gulf war. you are highly underestimating its military power. it took one attmpt to oust saddams government. and was done so in a very quick manner.

az_bont · Post by **az_bont** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 3:58 pm

Covar wrote:Iraq was in the top 3 of biggest threats to the US since the first gulf war. you are highly underestimating its military power.

The following sources contradict your statements.

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/03/ ... 6241.shtml
http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/news/ ... ance01.htm
http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/prin ... mentID=607

Lartrak · Post by **Lartrak** » Tue Feb 21, 2006 5:06 pm

az_bont wrote:
Smurph wrote:
Nico0020 wrote:
Nope. I am just not oblivious to the fact that the USA is attempting to dominate the world.
If the US was attempting to dominate the world it could have been done many times over. All your responces are just uneducated rants.
Very true.
It took two attempts and the support of three allied nations to take over Iraq; a third world country with a population of 26 million and a poorly-equipped army.

There isn't a chance in hell of it happening.

We didn't really need the support, but yes. We could not use military forces to take over the world by direct action. We can't really dominate the world at all, actually, though we can be the single largest influence.

Ex-Cyber · Post by **Ex-Cyber** » Wed Feb 22, 2006 1:06 pm

The US "dominates" largely through political and economic means, to say nothing of dirty tricks (extraordinary rendition, anyone?). Anyone who substantially challenges US interests - the legitimacy of their own interests and rights notwithstanding - does so at their peril. I think it's fair to say that that's a form of domination, though not as blatant or as complete as a "real" empire.

armada · Post by **armada** » Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:13 am

George W Bush, USA president during the State of the Union address on 28 January 2003:

"Throughout the 20th century small groups of men seized control of great nations, built armies and arsenals, and set out to dominate the weak and intimidate the world."

hmm....

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:17 am

LMAO.

Domination with style.

Oh my fucking god. That is classic. Too bad that jackass said he isn't coming back.