What poltcial party are you....

Zealous zerotype · Post by **Zealous zerotype** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:35 pm

Me I am a liberal republcian.Yea I know rare to see a liberal republcian,but um here I am.So also what is everyone else?

Adam3000 · Post by **Adam3000** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:44 pm

No, you are a nothing. you can't be in a political party unless you are a registered voter, and you said you are 15.

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:47 pm

National Socialist.

weeperofsouls · Post by **weeperofsouls** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:51 pm

unalligned, though the libertarian party appeals to me.

Zealous zerotype · Post by **Zealous zerotype** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 10:58 pm

Adam3000 wrote:No, you are a nothing. you can't be in a political party unless you are a registered voter, and you said you are 15.

Dude seriously shut up.You can have opinions and views even thogh you are nto over 18,You still have thoughts even though you did nto come out of a womans vigina earlier than some one else...

Warmachine · Post by **Warmachine** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:28 pm

I am only 17 and turning 18 in May, but from what it seems, I am a democrat.

DCFan2004 · Post by **DCFan2004** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:31 pm

Republican

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:37 pm

Jeeba Jabba wrote:National Socialist.

DaMadFiddler · Post by **DaMadFiddler** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:38 pm

I'm registered Democrat right now for purposes of voting in the primaries last spring.

That said, my views are much closer to those of the Green party, but I am very strongly opposed to the notion of political parties in the first place.

So I guess my standing is anti-party.

FETUS · Post by **FETUS** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:40 pm

I'm pretty centered but I do lean to the right a lot, mostly on moral issues.

DaMadFiddler · Post by **DaMadFiddler** » Wed Nov 10, 2004 11:51 pm

zerotype wrote:Me I am a liberal republcian.Yea I know rare to see a liberal republcian,but um here I am.So also what is everyone else?

Also--I hate to break it to you, but you may very well be party-less if that's your stance. The Republican party is shifting into the deep-right...a process which started with the neoconservative movement of the 1980s. The Democratic party has been straddling the "moderatism" fence for a while now, and the only thing that really remains on the so-called "left" is the Green party.

It also doesn't help that definitions have been changing--the Democratic party used to be large-government programming, with many socialist elements (a need which arose from the Great Depression, and just kind of lingered afterwards). However, they've become far more populist in recent years. The Republican party used to be for smaller, more localized control and less regulation...and more limited spending. None of that holds true any more, except parts of the "less regulation" bit. Reagan and "W" don't have anything akin to the same agenda as the likes of Teddy R, Ike, and Nixon...just as Wilson, FDR, and Kennedy were nothing like Clinton.

There are remnants of the old system. Ted Kennedy is a "classic" Democrat. John McCain is a "traditional" Republican, from before the party became the mouthpiece of evangelists and corporate interests. Unfortunately, there's still a very large body of the American public that hasn't recognized the change yet, and supports one party or another thinking they're what they used to be.

jaredfogle · Post by **jaredfogle** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:04 am

No party affiliation, but I'm very conservative.

Jeeba Jabba · Post by **Jeeba Jabba** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:05 am

DaMadFiddler wrote:
zerotype wrote:Me I am a liberal republcian.Yea I know rare to see a liberal republcian,but um here I am.So also what is everyone else?
Also--I hate to break it to you, but you may very well be party-less if that's your stance. The Republican party is shifting into the deep-right...a process which started with the neoconservative movement of the 1980s. The Democratic party has been straddling the "moderatism" fence for a while now, and the only thing that really remains on the so-called "left" is the Green party.

It also doesn't help that definitions have been changing--the Democratic party used to be large-government programming, with many socialist elements (a need which arose from the Great Depression, and just kind of lingered afterwards). However, they've become far more populist in recent years. The Republican party used to be for smaller, more localized control and less regulation...and more limited spending. None of that holds true any more, except parts of the "less regulation" bit. Reagan and "W" don't have anything akin to the same agenda as the likes of Teddy R, Ike, and Nixon...just as Wilson, FDR, and Kennedy were nothing like Clinton.

There are remnants of the old system. Ted Kennedy is a "classic" Democrat. John McCain is a "traditional" Republican, from before the party became the mouthpiece of evangelists and corporate interests. Unfortunately, there's still a very large body of the American public that hasn't recognized the change yet, and supports one party or another thinking they're what they used to be.

S. Thompson · Post by **S. Thompson** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 12:46 am

Independent Party...

No, seriously...

- Fuzmeister

greay · Post by **greay** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 1:28 am

Do we have to choose?

I hate politics and I hate political parties.

OneThirty8 · Post by **OneThirty8** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 6:47 am

Democrat.

Matisfaction · Post by **Matisfaction** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:10 am

I voted Natural Law party in the last (England) election! I really liked there policies.

Orange_Ribbon · Post by **Orange_Ribbon** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 7:57 am

I am a moderate that leans more toward Democrate.

Covar · Post by **Covar** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:12 am

Republican. i'll be registered in a month too so there.

DaMadFiddler. i would say the Republican party has shifted less than the Democratic party. (comparing the classic against modern) Teddy R is closer to Regan than FDR is to Clinton. needless to say i have respect for FDR and none for Clinton so feel free to bash my statement and light the flames, but if i wanted to be biased i would have compared FDR to Carter.

Lord_Ball · Post by **Lord_Ball** » Thu Nov 11, 2004 8:44 am

I do find myself disagreeing with democrats more often, but I really don't like any parties. What the heck good is the party system anyway...

Seriously What does it truely accomplish other than dividing the country? Without it people would support the candidate they like best not because they are a certain party. I mean a lady I work with said she'd NEVER vote for a republican - what if the rep had MUCH better ideas.

What poltcial party are you....

What poltcial party are you....

Re: What poltcial party are you....

Re: What poltcial party are you....