How many bytes = a MB ?
-
- Mental DCEmu
- Posts: 319
- https://www.artistsworkshop.eu/meble-kuchenne-na-wymiar-warszawa-gdzie-zamowic/
- Joined: Sun Mar 16, 2003 11:37 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
-
- DC Developer
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
That depends on who you ask. According to the new IEC standard:Bolgan wrote:How many bytes = a MB ?
1 MB (megabyte) = 1000000 bytes.
1 MiB (mebibyte) = 1048576 bytes.
Have a look at http://www.romulus2.com/articles/guides ... ytes.shtml.
The old standard is ambiguous. The 'MB' on compact discs does not conform to the new standard as it refers to 1048576 bytes.
-
- DC Developer
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 9:02 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
Oh yes. That.
The old standard isn't at all ambiguous, until you come to people who manufacture hard drives, who use multiples of 1000 instead of 1024. Nobody else ever used KB meaning 1000, or MB meaning 1000000.
Anyway, what kind of a stupid name is a mebibyte, and how the heck are you supposed to pronounce it. It gets worse - how does a gibibyte sound to you? Tebibyte? Pebibyte? Exbibyte?
The old standard isn't at all ambiguous, until you come to people who manufacture hard drives, who use multiples of 1000 instead of 1024. Nobody else ever used KB meaning 1000, or MB meaning 1000000.
Anyway, what kind of a stupid name is a mebibyte, and how the heck are you supposed to pronounce it. It gets worse - how does a gibibyte sound to you? Tebibyte? Pebibyte? Exbibyte?
-
- DC Developer
- Posts: 1753
- Joined: Thu Jan 16, 2003 4:01 am
- Location: The Netherlands
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
But everyone has used K meaning 1000, and M meaning 1000000 for ages. Why not apply that to bytes as well? It makes a lot more sense to me to use a different prefix for the 'power-of-2' numbers. I agree that 'mebibyte' and the others sound terrible though.BlackAura wrote:Oh yes. That.
The old standard isn't at all ambiguous, until you come to people who manufacture hard drives, who use multiples of 1000 instead of 1024. Nobody else ever used KB meaning 1000, or MB meaning 1000000.
-
- DCEmu Freak
- Posts: 82
- Joined: Mon Jun 16, 2003 10:05 pm
- Location: Brisbane, Australia
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0
- Contact:
And Telstrafinite wrote:It's ambiguous when it comes to scientific notation, and I'll give them that much. But BlackAura is right, the name they chose is horrid. It just sounds ridiculous, the only people who will use it are the standards organisations themselves, and perhaps a few universities/institutes.
-
- DC Developer
- Posts: 9951
- Joined: Sun Dec 30, 2001 9:02 am
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 1 time
As long as you're within the appropriate problem domain (computers, basically) the meanings of K and M shouldn't be ambiguous, but if you start mixing them with non-computer related measurements it might get a little confusing.
I don't know why, but I've started abbreviating them to Ki'byte, Me'byte and Gi'byte. Personally, I think those would sound better than Kibibyte, Mebibyte and so on. Zebibyte and Yobibyte sound even worse.
I don't know why, but I've started abbreviating them to Ki'byte, Me'byte and Gi'byte. Personally, I think those would sound better than Kibibyte, Mebibyte and so on. Zebibyte and Yobibyte sound even worse.
-
- DCEmu's Cheerleader
- Posts: 2553
- Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 7:38 pm
- Location: Insert Witty Comment here
- Has thanked: 0
- Been thanked: 0