The Funny Political Pictures Thread

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:45 pm

404NotFound wrote:
"ministry of homeland security"

Yow! More pop-1984 references. After actually READING the book, any Joe Schlub would realize it's less about government control and more about freezing the classes in place. It's saying "this is the only way communism would work, because once the lower class rise up they gotta stay there somehow."

Yow! Way to overreact.. Again.

Post by **|darc|** » Mon Sep 27, 2004 3:50 pm

404NotFound wrote:"ministry of homeland security"

Yow! More pop-1984 references. After actually READING the book, any Joe Schlub would realize it's less about government control and more about freezing the classes in place. It's saying "this is the only way communism would work, because once the lower class rise up they gotta stay there somehow."

Because as we all know, there is only one strict way to interpret the book, and they mention Communism every other line in 1984.

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:15 pm

Ak? · Post by **Ak?** » Fri Oct 01, 2004 12:52 pm

toastman · Post by **toastman** » Fri Oct 01, 2004 4:55 pm

404NotFound wrote: "ministry of homeland security"

Yow! More pop-1984 references. After actually READING the book, any Joe Schlub would realize it's less about government control and more about freezing the classes in place. It's saying "this is the only way communism would work, because once the lower class rise up they gotta stay there somehow."

1984 is a warning about the irreparable damage that would occur if a governing body could come into power and stay there.
Now, if people would read Animal Farm as well, then they would see that the Bush administration is following it to the letter.

Ex-Cyber · Post by **Ex-Cyber** » Sun Oct 03, 2004 11:04 am

mattcky666 · Post by **mattcky666** » Mon Oct 04, 2004 9:07 am

http://www.rockpapersaddam.com/index.html

pictures taken from saddams trial in iraq (where i got disp. pic from) - basically saddam wants to play rock paper scissors

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Sat Oct 16, 2004 6:17 pm

Adam3000 · Post by **Adam3000** » Sat Oct 16, 2004 7:10 pm

Ex-Cyber · Post by **Ex-Cyber** » Sun Oct 17, 2004 6:21 pm

Ex-Cyber · Post by **Ex-Cyber** » Wed Oct 20, 2004 8:24 am

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 5:46 pm

hearld500 · Post by **hearld500** » Sun Oct 24, 2004 7:59 pm

hearld500 · Post by **hearld500** » Thu Oct 28, 2004 7:06 pm

[img]http://www.img9.imgspot.com/?u=04/301/19/BushKer1.jpg[/img]

Post by **melancholy** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 12:36 am

Here's one I thought up myself:

Wagh · Post by **Wagh** » Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:35 pm

DaMadFiddler · Post by **DaMadFiddler** » Sun Oct 31, 2004 6:22 am

Covar · Post by **Covar** » Sun Oct 31, 2004 2:51 pm

Ex-Cyber wrote:

thats a good unbiased comparison right there.

Lunchbox · Post by **Lunchbox** » Sun Oct 31, 2004 4:12 pm

hearld500 wrote:

mkjones · Post by **mkjones** » Sun Oct 31, 2004 6:08 pm

toastman wrote:
Lunchbox wrote:
Chile wrote:
I don't get this one. Whats so significant about the ring? It looks faked
Also, those are two different hands if you want to be really nit-picking it.

Hmm, and technically he would be INVISIBLE