RadQuake Final

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:21 pm

the new RADquake has been released.
just so you dont compare with an old version: http://imrtechnology.sourceforge.net/ph ... .php?t=644

typoEDR · Post by **typoEDR** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 2:37 pm

speud wrote:the new RADquake has been released.
just so you dont compare with an old version: http://imrtechnology.sourceforge.net/ph ... .php?t=597

I'm stupid, I know that, but I not quite clear what this means:

speud wrote: - converted SDL rendering to 2d PVR rendering

I know there is no hardware 3D acceleration (is there?), so does it mean you're rendering to screen through straight PVR commands rather than SDL commands?

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:03 pm

typoEDR wrote:
speud wrote:the new RADquake has been released.
just so you dont compare with an old version: http://imrtechnology.sourceforge.net/ph ... .php?t=597
I'm stupid, I know that, but I not quite clear what this means:

speud wrote: - converted SDL rendering to 2d PVR rendering
I know there is no hardware 3D acceleration (is there?), so does it mean you're rendering to screen through straight PVR commands rather than SDL commands?

i dont want to hijack this topic. you can ask your questions in the official thread, id be glad to answer.

Nyarlathotep · Post by **Nyarlathotep** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:51 pm

Speud in his RADQuake readme wrote:I'd like to mention here a few people that didn't help, their negative, unrespectful and ungrateful attitude is a shame for the DC scene.
Here they are: Wraggster, souLLy, ace, Ender, Butters and Christuserloeser.
There were probably some more people but those are the ones I can think of at the moment.
Also dcemulation.org and dcemu.co.uk tend to bash some devvers for personnal reasons, so if you are a devver willing to contribute i don't recommand these places.

Kind of pathetic, and I think you know it.

Post by **Quzar** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:56 pm

Nyarlathotep wrote:
Speud in his RADQuake readme wrote:I'd like to mention here a few people that didn't help, their negative, unrespectful and ungrateful attitude is a shame for the DC scene.
Here they are: Wraggster, souLLy, ace, Ender, Butters and Christuserloeser.
There were probably some more people but those are the ones I can think of at the moment.
Also dcemulation.org and dcemu.co.uk tend to bash some devvers for personnal reasons, so if you are a devver willing to contribute i don't recommand these places.

Kind of pathetic, and I think you know it.

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 3:56 pm

its just my opinion. since i thank those who helped i dont see any reason why i wouldnt mention those who didnt. anyway, glad you read the readme file.

people who read it are free to make themselves an opinion on the persons and sites mentionned. fact is those people and sites acted really negatively with this project, and it was a good place to mention it. i really dont care about what you think about it, and your reaction doesnt surprise me at all.

also i still post here because there are still some interesting projects and people here, though dont expect me to contribute to this forum that much.

Nyarlathotep · Post by **Nyarlathotep** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:07 pm

If you think anyone except you cares about your little feuds, you're sadly mistaken.

At best: deeply unprofessional and immature.

At worst: Libel and / or slander.

WRAGGSTER · Post by **WRAGGSTER** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:08 pm

Nice release

Just a shame you have a really bad personality, oh and DCemu uk doesnt bash any devvers, never have never will.

I just take into account those with double standards.

http://www.mgforums.com/forums/showthread.php?t=16192

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:10 pm

well done. just so you know its old news, and i never said i never did such things in the past.

Post by **melancholy** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:14 pm

Hey speud, will you take my icons out of the new release? I don't feel right having them there when they are only half finished. Maybe someday I will finish them, but for now I'd rather they not be there in such an unuseable state. Thanks.

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 4:19 pm

sure melancholy. i think it could have been used by some people anyway, but if thats really what you want ill remove them no problem.

Steve-O · Post by **Steve-O** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 5:54 pm

is there any big improvements over Version 4.4 ?? I just burnt V4.4 to disc

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 6:08 pm

the improvements are listed in the official thread.
also theres a bug with non PAL dreamcast so i suggest you wait a bit its fixed and visit the official thread later to get the fixed files.

DCmad · Post by **DCmad** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 7:33 pm

as its wince free, can i launch it from dream inducer?

edit: hope there's no unexpected bugs with DI, like nester does...

Post by **Tyne** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:05 pm

nice release speud, I'll have to do some Envenom testing on this as soon as I get another beta version ready - which will be *very* soon my hungry beta testers.

speud · Post by **speud** » Wed Aug 25, 2004 8:19 pm

thanks tyne. cant wait to see the final release, i really enjoyed the preview

it wont work with dchakker/demomenu, and i doubt it would work with dreaminducer either.

also people who got the files from somewhere else than the official thread should check IMR tech forums, the previous release was buggy and its links have been removed. a bug fix has been released but nobody who can test it with a non PAL DC reported if it worked or not yet.

TheDumbAss · Post by **TheDumbAss** » Thu Aug 26, 2004 12:07 am

Not going to have time to test this for awhile... mandatory overtime (and I already work 12hr days normally), visitors from out of town, and 2 weddings to go to all in the next couple weeks.

but I did have time to mirror it on edgefiles...

http://www.edgefiles.com/file.x?id=/qua ... _speud.rar
or
http://www.edgefiles.com/files/16425.html

I dont have time to do an update to the RADQuake page(s) on Console.Quakepit.net though...

mankrip · Post by **mankrip** » Thu Aug 26, 2004 12:28 am

(and I already work 12hr days normally)

speud · Post by **speud** » Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:01 am

thanks for including the original readme file without any alteration as specified.

q_006 · Post by **q_006** » Thu Aug 26, 2004 1:04 am

is this really the final version of Quake (for DC)?
there's nothing else to improve on?