Ford accused of promoting gayness

[Roofus]

A week after they declared victory over Walt Disney Co., Christian activists have fired another missile in their long war against companies they think are destroying traditional American values.

The target this time is Ford Motor Co., which Christians should boycott as ?the company which has done the most to affirm and promote the homosexual lifestyle,? the American Family Association says on a Web site it put up Monday, boycottford.com.

The AFA, the nonprofit group run by the Rev. Donald Wildmon, criticized Ford for donating money to gay-rights organizations (Ford promises to give up to $1,000 to the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Discrimination for every Jaguar and Land Rover it sells to gays and lesbians), sponsoring gay pride celebrations, advertising in gay-oriented publications and ?redefining the definition of the family to include homosexual marriage,? Randy Sharp, the organization?s director of special projects, said in an interview Tuesday.

Officials at Ford did not return telephone calls seeking comment.

Link

[Skater_dusto]

Don't they have anything better to do?

[FETUS]

apparently not. I disagree with the lifestyle, but I'm not gonna boycott ford for there charitable contributions.

[Smurph]

Don't they have anything better to do?

I know. Seriously.

[Zealous zerotype]

I'm glad that my dad helps to donate money to gays and lesbians.

[WhtCastle]

The Purple Probes gave it away.

[ghostparty]

Don't they have anything better to do?

What!?!
And not further the expansion of the White race?
What else would we do!?!

[Veggita2099]

to forcing managers to attend diversity training on how to promote the acceptance of homosexuality

Im imagine a lot of companies have this now. You can not have a company thta goes around bashing people cause of there sexuality. Not only would you lose customers, but you could be sued.

It is ashame what the "so called" Church going people are doing anymore. They are turning more people away. Churchs are supposed to be there with doors open for people to seek the lord, not going around terrorizing everybody cause they do something that don't set well with them. More and more people are turning away from the churches and it is really ashame.

[DaMadFiddler]

Sorry about the length of this post, but here is a very relevant bit of writing on the subject: namely, the appendix to famous former slave Frederick Douglass' autobiography, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass.

I find, since reading over the foregoing Narrative,
that I have, in several instances, spoken in such a
tone and manner, respecting religion, as may possi-
bly lead those unacquainted with my religious views
to suppose me an opponent of all religion. To re-
move the liability of such misapprehension, I deem
it proper to append the following brief explanation.
What I have said respecting and against religion, I
mean strictly to apply to the ~slaveholding religion~ of
this land, and with no possible reference to Christi-
anity proper; for, between the Christianity of this
land, and the Christianity of Christ, I recognize the
widest possible difference--so wide, that to receive
the one as good, pure, and holy, is of necessity to re-
ject the other as bad, corrupt, and wicked. To be the
friend of the one, is of necessity to be the enemy
of the other. I love the pure, peaceable, and impar-
tial Christianity of Christ: I therefore hate the cor-
rupt, slaveholding, women-whipping, cradle-plunder-
ing, partial and hypocritical Christianity of this land.
Indeed, I can see no reason, but the most deceitful
one, for calling the religion of this land Christianity.
I look upon it as the climax of all misnomers, the
boldest of all frauds, and the grossest of all libels.
Never was there a clearer case of "stealing the livery
of the court of heaven to serve the devil in." I am
filled with unutterable loathing when I contem-
plate the religious pomp and show, together with the
horrible inconsistencies, which every where surround
me. We have men-stealers for ministers, women-
whippers for missionaries, and cradle-plunderers for
church members. The man who wields the blood-
clotted cowskin during the week fills the pulpit on
Sunday, and claims to be a minister of the meek and
lowly Jesus. The man who robs me of my earnings
at the end of each week meets me as a class-leader
on Sunday morning, to show me the way of life,
and the path of salvation. He who sells my sister,
for purposes of prostitution, stands forth as the pi-
ous advocate of purity. He who proclaims it a re-
ligious duty to read the Bible denies me the right
of learning to read the name of the God who made
me. He who is the religious advocate of marriage
robs whole millions of its sacred influence, and leaves
them to the ravages of wholesale pollution. The
warm defender of the sacredness of the family re-
lation is the same that scatters whole families,--sun-
dering husbands and wives, parents and children,
sisters and brothers,--leaving the hut vacant, and the
hearth desolate. We see the thief preaching against
theft, and the adulterer against adultery. We have
men sold to build churches, women sold to support
the gospel, and babes sold to purchase Bibles for
the POOR HEATHEN! ALL FOR THE GLORY OF GOD AND THE
GOOD OF SOULS! The slave auctioneer's bell and the
church-going bell chime in with each other, and the
bitter cries of the heart-broken slave are drowned
in the religious shouts of his pious master. Revivals
of religion and revivals in the slave-trade go hand
in hand together. The slave prison and the church
stand near each other. The clanking of fetters and
the rattling of chains in the prison, and the pious
psalm and solemn prayer in the church, may be
heard at the same time. The dealers in the bodies
and souls of men erect their stand in the presence
of the pulpit, and they mutually help each other.
The dealer gives his blood-stained gold to support
the pulpit, and the pulpit, in return, covers his in-
fernal business with the garb of Christianity. Here
we have religion and robbery the allies of each other
--devils dressed in angels' robes, and hell presenting
the semblance of paradise.

The Christianity of America is a Christianity, of
whose votaries it may be as truly said, as it was of
the ancient scribes and Pharisees, "They bind heavy
burdens, and grievous to be borne, and lay them on
men's shoulders, but they themselves will not move
them with one of their fingers. All their works they
do for to be seen of men.--They love the upper-
most rooms at feasts, and the chief seats in the syna-
gogues, . . . . . . and to be called of men, Rabbi,
Rabbi.--But woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees,
hypocrites! for ye shut up the kingdom of heaven
against men; for ye neither go in yourselves, neither
suffer ye them that are entering to go in. Ye devour
widows' houses, and for a pretence make long
prayers; therefore ye shall receive the greater dam-
nation. Ye compass sea and land to make one prose-
lyte, and when he is made, ye make him twofold
more the child of hell than yourselves.--Woe unto
you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay
tithe of mint, and anise, and cumin, and have omit-
ted the weightier matters of the law, judgment,
mercy, and faith; these ought ye to have done, and
not to leave the other undone. Ye blind guides!
which strain at a gnat, and swallow a camel. Woe
unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye
make clean the outside of the cup and of the platter;
but within, they are full of extortion and excess.--
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for
ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed ap-
pear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead
men's bones, and of all uncleanness. Even so ye also
outwardly appear righteous unto men, but within
ye are full of hypocrisy and iniquity."

Dark and terrible as is this picture, I hold it to be
strictly true of the overwhelming mass of professed
Christians in America. They strain at a gnat, and
swallow a camel. Could any thing be more true of
our churches? They would be shocked at the propo-
sition of fellowshipping a SHEEP-stealer; and at the
same time they hug to their communion a MAN-
stealer, and brand me with being an infidel, if I
find fault with them for it. They attend with Phari-
saical strictness to the outward forms of religion, and
at the same time neglect the weightier matters of
the law, judgment, mercy, and faith. They are al-
ways ready to sacrifice, but seldom to show mercy.
They are they who are represented as professing to
love God whom they have not seen, whilst they hate
their brother whom they have seen. They love the
heathen on the other side of the globe. They can
pray for him, pay money to have the Bible put into
his hand, and missionaries to instruct him; while
they despise and totally neglect the heathen at their
own doors.

Such is, very briefly, my view of the religion of
this land; and to avoid any misunderstanding, grow-
ing out of the use of general terms, I mean by the
religion of this land, that which is revealed in the
words, deeds, and actions, of those bodies, north and
south, calling themselves Christian churches, and yet
in union with slaveholders. It is against religion, as
presented by these bodies, that I have felt it my
duty to testify.

I conclude these remarks by copying the following
portrait of the religion of the south, (which is, by
communion and fellowship, the religion of the
north,) which I soberly affirm is "true to the life,"
and without caricature or the slightest exaggeration.

It is said to have been drawn, several years before
the present anti-slavery agitation began, by a north-
ern Methodist preacher, who, while residing at the
south, had an opportunity to see slaveholding mor-
als, manners, and piety, with his own eyes. "Shall
I not visit for these things? saith the Lord. Shall not
my soul be avenged on such a nation as this?"

It was followed by a series of parodies of scriptures.

[Covar]

apparently not. I disagree with the lifestyle, but I'm not gonna boycott ford for there charitable contributions.

[Darksaviour69]

these so called Christians give real Christians a bad name, i known in ireland and the uk , this sort of gay bashing does not happen (only small very right skin heads to it).

i'm not saying that Christians supports gays, or approve but this sort of behaviour is not Christian like, "shall not judge" " cast the fist stone"...

the only Christian group i know would do this is Ian Paisley's Free Presbyterians (wanker), he belives the pope (john paul) is/was the anti-christ!

[Hawq]

The Purple Probes gave it away.

I rather think the name 'Probe' was a bit of a clue as well

i'm not saying that Christians supports gays, or approve but this sort of behaviour is not Christian like, "shall not judge" " cast the fist stone"...

The 'Fist' stone eh? now that sounds very fruity, sounds like these christians in question are trying to hide the truth from themselves

[FETUS]

these so called Christians give real Christians a bad name, i known in ireland and the uk , this sort of gay bashing does not happen (only small very right skin heads to it).

i'm not saying that Christians supports gays, or approve but this sort of behaviour is not Christian like, "shall not judge" " cast the fist stone"...

the only Christian group i know would do this is Ian Paisley's Free Presbyterians (wanker), he belives the pope (john paul) is/was the anti-christ!

I really hate the misuse of the "cast the first stone" story there are 2 versions wich give it 2 very different meanings. Both are an adultress tied about to be stoned when the priest says "He who is without sin, cast the first stone" When nobody does; A-She is let go because everyone sins to some extent, B-The priest grabs a large stone crushes her skull and says "I am without sin, but to leave justice only in the hands of the pure leads to no justice. What kind of world would that be?"

I know I didn't get all the words right but thats the jist of it.

[Smiley]

A week after they declared victory over Walt Disney Co.,

Wtf?! What did they claim Disney was doing wrong?

[greay]

RTFA.

Most recently, the AFA ended a nine-year boycott of the Walt Disney Co., which it launched because of what it felt was the company?s ?attitude, arrogance and embrace of the homosexual lifestyle.?

The AFA said it was moving on because ?we have made our point.? Disney said it never changed any of its policies, but Sharp pointed to an executive shuffle and the dissolution of Disney?s deal with the founders of the Miramax studio, which seemed to specialize in films designed to get Wildmon?s goat, notably ?Kids,? ?Priest? and ?Dogma.?

FETUS -- where does that second version of the story come from? I don't remember it from the Bible, but I did miss a couple books & I'm more familiar w/the Old Testament than the new.

[FETUS]

It's actually an old jewish version of the story not exactly sure but I believe it was an attempt to point out some stupidity in christianity kinda sayin "thats a nice concept, but this is the real world"

[Sir Savant]

Wow, this group is stupid. I would just love to meet someone from this group, so I can make them feel stupid.

Their parents needed to whip them when they were kids.

[Rand Linden]

Wow, this group is stupid. I would just love to meet someone from this group, so I can make them feel stupid.

Stupid people rarely recognize it.

Rand.

[Sir Savant]

I love you rand.

[Ominous 0nionfrog]

Wow, this group is stupid. I would just love to meet someone from this group, so I can make them feel stupid.

Stupid people rarely recognize it.

Rand.

very true...